Banks have been an integral part of the global economy for centuries, providing financial services to individuals and businesses alike. However, there have been instances where banks have been found to violate laws, including the Cestui Que Vie Act, tax reporting, and accounting laws. Moreover, they have been prosecuted for not reporting signature in exchange for cash as well as signature in exchange for funds assessed transactions accurately. This report aims to provide an unbiased and uncensored account of the history of such violations.
When it comes to signatures in exchange for funds, there are a few different laws that may come into play depending on the specific circumstances. Here are some of the most important laws to consider:
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): The UCC is a set of laws that govern commercial transactions in the United States. One of the key provisions of the UCC is Section 3-401, which establishes the basic rules for negotiable instruments (like checks and promissory notes). Under this section, a signature on a negotiable instrument is generally sufficient to transfer ownership of the instrument, as long as the signature is made with the intent to authenticate the instrument. This means that if someone signs a check or promissory note, they are generally considered to be liable for the funds associated with that instrument.
- Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act): The E-SIGN Act is a federal law that establishes the legal validity of electronic signatures. Under this law, an electronic signature is generally considered to be legally equivalent to a traditional ink signature, as long as it meets certain requirements (such as being linked to the signer’s identity and being created with an appropriate level of security).
- State law: In addition to these federal laws, there may be state-level laws that govern signatures in exchange for funds. For example, some states have specific laws related to the use of electronic signatures in real estate transactions.
- Contract law: Finally, it’s important to note that signatures in exchange for funds are often governed by basic contract law principles. This means that in order for a signature to be legally binding, it generally needs to be part of a valid contract that includes a clear offer, acceptance, and consideration (i.e. something of value being exchanged).
One of the ways banks violate tax reporting laws is by not reporting signatures in exchange for cash. This practice is commonly referred to as “smurfing,” and it involves breaking up large cash deposits into smaller transactions to avoid detection by the authorities. The purpose of smurfing is to hide the source of the funds, which could be the proceeds of illegal activities such as drug trafficking or money laundering.
Banks have also been prosecuted for not accurately assessing transactions involving signature in exchange for funds. In such transactions, an individual signs a document agreeing to transfer funds to another party in exchange for a service or product.
One high-profile case of banks violating tax reporting laws is the HSBC scandal. In 2012, it was revealed that HSBC had engaged in money laundering and had failed to report suspicious transactions to the authorities. The bank was fined $1.9 billion by the US Department of Justice and entered into a deferred prosecution agreement. The scandal prompted calls for increased regulation of the banking industry.
Another example of banks violating tax reporting laws is the Panama Papers scandal. In 2016, an anonymous source leaked 11.5 million documents from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, revealing how the firm had helped wealthy individuals and companies set up offshore accounts to evade taxes. The documents implicated several major banks, including HSBC, UBS, and Credit Suisse, in facilitating tax evasion. The scandal led to widespread public outrage and calls for increased transparency in the financial sector.
Banks have also been known to violate accounting laws, which require them to maintain accurate records of their financial transactions. One example is the Libor scandal, which involved major banks colluding to manipulate the Libor interest rate, which is used to set the interest rates on trillions of dollars in loans and financial instruments. The scandal led to several major banks being fined billions of dollars and raised questions about the integrity of the financial system.
The Cestui Que Vie Act, which was passed in 1666 in England, is an act that addresses the rights of people who are considered “dead” or “lost” at sea. It provides for the appointment of trustees to manage the property of such individuals until they are found or return to life. However, some have alleged that banks have used this act to take control of people’s assets and use them for their own purposes.
In recent years, there have been several cases where banks have been accused of violating tax reporting and accounting laws. One such case is the scandal involving the Swiss bank UBS, which was accused of helping US citizens evade taxes. In 2009, UBS paid a $780 million settlement to the US government to avoid prosecution.
Another notable case involves the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), which was shut down in 1991 due to allegations of money laundering, fraud, and other illegal activities. The bank’s collapse resulted in losses of billions of dollars for investors and depositors.
Banks have also been prosecuted for not reporting signature in exchange for cash as well as signature in exchange for funds assessed transactions accurately. This is a violation of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), which requires banks to report suspicious transactions to the government. In 2012, HSBC paid a $1.9 billion settlement to the US government after it was found to have violated the BSA by failing to report suspicious transactions related to drug trafficking and terrorism financing.
In addition to these specific cases, there have been broader criticisms of the banking industry’s practices. Some have accused banks of engaging in predatory lending, charging high fees and interest rates, and engaging in unethical or even illegal activities to generate profits.
Despite these criticisms and scandals, banks remain a critical component of the global economy. They provide a range of financial services that are essential to individuals, businesses, and governments alike. However, it is important for regulators to hold banks accountable when they violate laws or engage in unethical practices.
In conclusion, banks have a long and complex history, and there have been instances where they have been found to violate laws and engage in unethical practices. However, it is important to acknowledge that banks also provide many valuable services to society. Moving forward, it is essential for regulators to hold banks accountable when they engage in illegal or unethical behavior, while also recognizing the importance of a healthy banking system to the global economy.
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): The text of the UCC can be found on the website of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School: https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc.
- Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act): The full text of the E-SIGN Act is available on the website of the Government Publishing Office: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-106publ229/pdf/PLAW-106publ229.pdf.
- State law: To find information on state-level laws related to signatures in exchange for funds, you may want to check the websites of your state’s legislative branch or attorney general’s office. Many states also have legal aid organizations or bar associations that may be able to provide information on relevant laws.
- Contract law: There are many resources available on contract law, including law school textbooks, legal blogs, and online legal research tools like LexisNexis and Westlaw. It may also be helpful to consult with an attorney who specializes in contract law to ensure that you fully understand the principles that apply to your situation.
- “The Big Short” by Michael Lewis: This book provides an engaging account of the 2008 financial crisis and the role that banks played in causing it.
- “Dark Towers: Deutsche Bank, Donald Trump, and an Epic Trail of Destruction” by David Enrich: This book explores the history of Deutsche Bank and its role in various financial scandals, including its relationship with former US President Donald Trump.
- “The Laundering Machine: How Fraud and Corruption Wash Money Through Banks” by Jeffrey Robinson: This book provides an in-depth look at the history of money laundering and the role that banks have played in facilitating it.
- “Banking Bad: Whistleblowers. Corporate cover-ups. One journalist’s fight for the truth” by Adele Ferguson: This book describes the investigation by journalist Adele Ferguson into the misconduct of Australian banks.
- The website of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN): This is the US government agency responsible for enforcing the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering laws. Their website provides information on current enforcement actions and guidance on compliance with regulations.
- “HSBC to pay $1.9bn in US money laundering settlement.” The Guardian, 11 Dec. 2012, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/dec/11/hsbc-to-pay-19bn-us-money-laundering-settlement.
- “Panama Papers: Why banks are likely to face more scrutiny.” BBC News, 7 Apr. 2016, https://www.bbc.com/news/business-35998187.
- “The LIBOR Scandal: The Fix Is In.” Investopedia, 27 Jan. 2022, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/070913/libor-scandal.asp.
- “Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual.” Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, 2022, https://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/manual_online.htm.
- “Tax Evasion and Avoidance.” OECD, https://www.oecd.org/tax/crime/tax-evasion-and-avoidance.htm.
- “Accounting Standards.” Financial Accounting Standards Board, https://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Page/LandingPage&cid=1175808241445.
Copyright 2023 – Chief Anu Khnem Ra Ka El